
Sorption Overview Series #5
Volumetric, Gravimetric, and Chromatographic Methods
After discussing the terminology of sorption and some fundamental differences in working modes, we can now turn to measurement techniques.
In the fifth entry in our Sorption Overview series, we will explore the three common methods of determining the sorption or uptake of a gas or a vapor in a material: gravimetric (e.g. DVS), volumetric, and chromatographic (also called breakthrough), each with key advantages and disadvantages.



Gravimetric Method
In a gravimetric method, the change in weight resulting from adsorption is directly measured using a highly sensitive microbalance. The change in net force measured by the balance as temperature and pressure/concentration change can be equated to gas uptake by the sample. Gravimetric measurements are some of the most accurate means of measuring uptakes of gases and vapors in a wide range of conditions.
Sample Mass Uptake
In a standard experiment, the sample is loaded in the balance and isolated in a chamber. The chamber temperature is carefully monitored, alongside the pressure/concentration of the gas phase. Change in mass given by the balance has three contributions: the change in sample mass given by uptake in the sample, a change in net buoyant force given by the change in density of the gas phase and a drag force of a gas flow on the sample pan. Buoyancy Force The buoyancy force is small for experiments at ambient pressure and temperature but can play a role at high pressure (>a few bar) where corrections may be required. Drag Force The drag force is only relevant when a dynamic mode is used, as the gas flow impinges on the balance parts and may need to be corrected through a blank. A way of minimizing both drag and buoyancy corrections is to construct the balance symmetrically, having a sample and a reference pan in identical configurations in the flow path. Advantages of Gravimetric MethodsA well-known benefit of gravimetric methods is that they typically require a low amount of sample: as little as 1-5 mg can be used to obtain reliable results for single component measurements. Conversely, the upper range of mass/volume is similarly much higher, a few grams and 10s of cm3 can be measured. Note that the mass range and accuracy depend on the performance and stability of the balance – SMS DVS balances have a total mass and resolution of 1 g / 0.01 µg for the low mass balance and 5 g / 0.1 µg for the high mass balance. Experimental Design
|

Volumetric Method
In volumetric methods a cell containing the adsorbent material is dosed sequentially from a known volume of gas. The pressure is monitored as the probe sorbs in the material, the equilibrium value of which is then used to calculate the final gas amount remaining in the cell using an equation of state. The difference between the initial and the final amount of gas is equal to the amount adsorbed.
Sample Uptake
Advantages of Volumetric Methods
Challenges and Considerations
|

Chromatographic / Breakthrough Methods
In chromatographic methods, the probe molecule flows over a packed bed / column of the material to be characterized. All of the important variables: temperature, total pressure/concentration, and flowrate are continuously monitored at the inlet and outlet of the column, which can then be used to determine a molar mass balance over the packed bed.
Method Modes
|

Check back soon for the conclusion of the series!
Check back soon to catch the final conclusion to our sorption overview blog series.
Along with our final thoughts on these comparable techniques, we will be giving away a free scientific resource summarising everything discussed in this blog series.
And don’t forget to check out the Sorption Hub user portal for more eLearning resources in materials characterization.